History of Minority Populations in the Child Welfare System of the United States Essay

expression 1Love, C. (2005). Not in our country? A critique of the unite States welf ar system by means of the lens of Chinas one child policy. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 14(2). 142-174. Retrieved May 21, 2010.The expression mainly focuses on the Family Planning Law in China and the laws in the joined States regarding society welf atomic number 18. two the countries aim to eliminate poverty from the societies and encourage development and growth. The author of the clause believes that some child laws call for been violated in achieving a level of success in implementing welfargon laws. Despite the efforts of the government, the people reenforcement below the poverty line are increasing each day in both the countries.The children are punished for the decisions of their parents as they do non let a separate formal identification. The bonnet on the family size in the United States legislature does not allow a woman to bear as many children as she wishes. The governmen t supports children in a family to a certain limit. However, after the reproductive cap has been crossed, the government does not provide any benefits to the child who has been born after the cap was crossed. These limitations on the reproductive choice of a woman demonstrate that the system if full of issues and inequalities. This is because the child who is born after the breeding cap is not entitled to the support from the government that other children are enjoying.Article 2Raghavan, R., Inoue, M., Ettner, S., Hamilton, B., & Landsverk, J. (2010). A Preliminary Analysis of the Receipt of Mental Health Services Consistent With National Standards Among churlren in the Child welfare System.American Journal of Public Health,100(4), 742-749. Retrieved May 21, 2010 from Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection data.In this article, the authors consummate a research to find out whether the children in the child welfare system of the United States bid mental health care as th e others receive. Data from the past three years was used to do the research and study. This data was collected from the National Survey for Child and Adolescent well-being. The sample size consisted of 3,802 individuals. The results showed that save half of the total sample size received mental health care that was consistent with a single national standard. However, there were only 10% of the total sample were fortunate enough to come health care which was consistent with all of the national standards. It was also found out that the older children were much likely to attract mental health care which is consistent with the national standards. Therefore the article concludes with the position that the child welfare system in the Unites States is not working fairly and those who need the support are not getting it.Article 3Dettlaff, A., de Haymes, M., Velazquez, S., Mindell, R., & Bruce, L. (2009). Emerging Issues at the Intersection of Immigration and Child Welfare Results from a Transnational Research and Policy Forum.Child Welfare,88(2), 47-67. Retrieved May 21, 2010, from Education Research Complete database.The authors of this article intend to reveal the issues related to child welfare system that an immigrant family has to face while moving to the United States. Child permanency, safety and well being have become the major concerns of a family moving to the United States. The increasing numbers of immigrants in the past few years suggest an increase in foregather and interaction with the child welfare system, but the numbers of immigrant children involved with the welfare system have not been measured.The author of the article also believes that the immigrant children are more likely to live in poverty than the children of the natives. moreover the authors reveal that the immigrant families in the United States are less likely to receive any financial benefits than the natives. The children that are related to the immigrant families are more likely to lack health insurance coverage than the native ones. These discrepancies in the child welfare system exist due to the fact that the parents of these immigrant children also do not have access to the benefits that a normal American would enjoy.